Especially with the rockets, the ammo seems quite weak for its cost.
Bullet ammo is fine, it is significantly stronger than uranium ammo. It is weak compared to most other mods, though - artillery shells have the same issue. In vanilla they are fine, but when adding any sort of other mods that add other ammo, they are quite weak. I'm unsure if that is a consideration or not in the balancing, seeing as the difficulty to get these is far higher than most other mods (ie, Rampant Arsenal for the most part) and they fall off heavily against more difficult modded enemies.
My concern mostly comes from the rockets and cannon shells, which feel outright weaker than their vanilla counterparts by a significant margin? For example, why would I use fusion rockets over nukes, they do orders of magnitude less damage and have a lesser AOE? Cannon shells have the same issue, seemingly weaker in all aspects compared to uranium cannon shells.

they are based on vanilla, but your research power get crazy op and all dmg researchers are infinite, just keep researching.

Also i will add a multiplier setting to base dmg at some update. You need to see that rampant add far stronger enemies than vanilla, this mod dont.

Cannon shells, rockets and all ammo are 150% stronger than base, and they are far cheaper, you just need the ap rockets to make the nuke fusion rocket for example.

The fusion nuke is placed before vanilla nukes, antimatter nukes will be after, then void nukes that will be far stronger.

Oh, I had assumed the fusion ones were meant to be better nukes, not pre nukes, cuz of the tech cost and reactor requirement. Mb

optional ammo added in 1.0.18