Hextorio - Build in hexagons


Adds dungeons, quests, an economy and trading system, the ability to level up items in the game, and an extra tier for transport belts, belt capacity, modules, quality, spidertrons, spaceship fuel recipes, chemical fuels, bullet magazines, rockets, combat robots, and nauvis ores (endgame). Also divides the planets into hexagons, which contain resources, enemy bases, or profitable trades. Get rich by selling your excess items, buy hexagons, and plunder the powerful dungeons on every planet!

Content
9 days ago
2.0
919
Transportation Logistics Combat Enemies Environment Mining Storage

b Error while on Gleba

3 days ago

Happened while exploring and expanding.

5565.492 Error MainLoop.cpp:1510: Exception at tick 9596255: The mod Hextorio - Build in hexagons (1.1.1) caused a non-recoverable error.
Please report this error to the mod author.

Error while running event hextorio::on_chunk_generated (ID 15)
count must be positive
stack traceback:
[C]: in function 'insert'
hextorio/api/coin_tiers.lua:360: in function 'update_inventory'
hextorio/api/coin_tiers.lua:409: in function 'add_coin_to_inventory'
hextorio/api/dungeons.lua:664: in function 'spawn_loot'
hextorio/api/dungeons.lua:243: in function 'spawn_hex'
hextorio/api/hex_grid.lua:569: in function 'init_dungeon_hex'
hextorio/api/hex_grid.lua:730: in function 'initialize_hex'
hextorio/api/hex_grid.lua:1701: in function 'on_chunk_generated'
hextorio/control.lua:188: in function <hextorio/control.lua:163>

a day ago
(updated a day ago)

Thanks for the report. Sorry for the inconvenience. I can't seem to reproduce this bug, and this type of bug actually is supposed to be impossible to occur given the current source code. If you can send a save file where this bug occurs, that'd be helpful.

a day ago

I loaded the last autosave after the error occured, then doing mostly the same thing as before and had no issues. Thaught I report it anyways.
I do not have that save anymore and it seems like it would not have helped anyways. Don't stress too much about it.

New response