Age of Production


Adding new machines to Space Age for more variety and bigger production!

Content
11 days ago
2.0
10.9K
Factorio: Space Age Icon Space Age Mod
Combat Mining Fluids Manufacturing

g [intended]Very low return when melting iron plates

20 days ago

Very low return when melting iron plates (and related items) into molten iron — intended or bug?

Hi!
I noticed something that looks potentially unintended in Age of Production (I’m on v1.7.7).

In your mod there’s a recipe to melt iron plates into molten iron:
40× Iron Plate → 20× Molten Iron (32s) (recipe: aop-iron-plate-melting)

In vanilla Space Age / Foundry casting (ignoring the Foundry’s built-in productivity for a fair baseline), the casting ratio is:
20× Molten Iron → 2× Iron Plate

So if someone ever converts plates → molten → plates, it becomes:
40 plates → 20 molten → 2 plates
That’s a 5% return (20× loss), which feels extremely harsh unless the intent is “resource sink / disposal only”.

A few questions:
Is the 40 plates → 20 molten value intentional, or could it be a misplaced scale/typo?
Are the nearby melt recipes for iron gears / iron stick / steel beams meant to follow the same “very low return” mechanic as well?
What is the intended gameplay purpose of these melt recipes? I initially assumed they’re meant to enable converting crafted items back into molten metal (e.g., for reprocessing or changing product chains), but with a 5% return they look more like pure disposal—maybe too low to be useful.

If you can confirm the design intent (or point to the intended use chain), I’ll adjust my expectations/modpack accordingly. Thanks!

20 days ago

Its intended or it would be op.

20 days ago

I did calculations to make the ratios equal. They return very little molten metal so there's no chance for loops to happen

19 days ago

Thanks for the quick reply!

Got it — makes sense to keep the molten return low to prevent any plate→molten→plate loops and avoid it becoming OP. I’ll treat these melt recipes as disposal / anti-loop mechanics in my modpack.

Appreciate the clarification!

New response