Logistic Reactor Next v2

by Kryzeth

Deliver nuclear fuel to reactors via the logistics network. Update of alleledev's Logistics Reactor Next, originally based on illysune's Logistics Reactor.

Content
24 days ago
2.0
290
Logistic network Power

b [Fixed] Crash when place logistic reactor

2 months ago

Same issue at linux server and my windows client save.
Error while running event kry-logistics-reactor-next::reactor-requester-on_initialized (ID 344)
kry-logistics-reactor-next/scripts/reactor-storage.lua:61: attempt to concatenate global 'localised_name' (a nil value)
stack traceback:
kry-logistics-reactor-next/scripts/reactor-storage.lua:61: in function 'set_reactor_requests'
kry-logistics-reactor-next/scripts/reactor-storage.lua:173: in function <kry-logistics-reactor-next/scripts/reactor-storage.lua:143>
stack traceback:
[C]: in function 'raise_event'
0-things/control/events/downstream.lua:32: in function '?'
0-things/lib/core/event.lua:198: in function 'raise'
0-things/control/thing.lua:645: in function 'initialize'
0-things/control/automatic-children.lua:90: in function 'create_child_thing'
0-things/control/automatic-children.lua:149: in function 'check_children'
0-things/control/automatic-children.lua:226: in function '?'
0-things/lib/core/event.lua:198: in function 'raise'
0-things/control/frame.lua:459: in function 'terminate'
0-things/control/frame.lua:175: in function 'on_subtick'
0-things/control/frame.lua:466: in function 'handler'
0-things/lib/core/event.lua:299: in function '?'
0-things/lib/core/event.lua:109: in function <0-things/lib/core/event.lua:107>"

2 months ago

Interesting, I hadn't tested with multiplayer at all, but I thought it would still work there if it worked in single player, I'll have to look into this, maybe have to use the same fix I mentioned in the other discussion thread

2 months ago
(updated 2 months ago)

Should be fixed in v7.1.1

For some reason, the localization requests don't go through when loading a multiplayer save, so I just removed them entirely and went with a different method for the default reactor request names (further info in the other discussion thread)

New response