Miniloader

by therax

Compact and UPS-friendly 1x1 loaders. Works with train cargo wagons, circuits, filters, and modded belts from Bob's, Krastorio, FactorioExtended Plus, Space Exploration, and Ultimate Belts.

Content
8 months ago
0.15 - 1.1
177K
Logistics

b Crash when blueprint excludes a miniloader

6 years ago

I was working on some rail blueprints which had nothing to do with miniloaders. I copied a section of track and tried to build it nearby when I received an miniloader-related error message and I was sent to the main menu. I've done it several times to verify it wasn't a one-time thing.

Here are some screenshots showing the problem.

https://prnt.sc/ibao52
https://prnt.sc/ibaoc7
https://prnt.sc/ibank9

I reverted to 1.5.7 and tried to reproduce it but had no luck. Something between 1.5.7 and 1.5.9 has caused this issue.

Thank you for making this mod! I love it and have miniloaders all over my factories.

6 years ago

Yes, I can confirm this error. 1.5.7 version is OK but 1.5.9 have this problem.

6 years ago

I have the same error in Factorio v0.16.22, Miniloader v1.5.9

I get this error:
40.279 Error MainLoop.cpp:1019: Exception at tick 10945297: Error while running event miniloader::on_put_item (ID 9)
miniloader/lualib/util.lua:65: invalid direction passed to rotate_box
40.279 Error ServerMultiplayerManager.cpp:95: MultiplayerManager failed: "Error while running event miniloader::on_put_item (ID 9)
miniloader/lualib/util.lua:65: invalid direction passed to rotate_box"

6 years ago

Fixed in 1.5.10.

Please use the forum thread though, since I didn't see these until I'd already fixed the bug due to a forum report.

6 years ago

You haven't fix the bug unfortunately, i still suffer from the same error in your lastest version.

6 years ago
(updated 6 years ago)

You haven't fix the bug unfortunately, i still suffer from the same error in your lastest version.

As noted in the forum thread, you were experiencing a different problem due to having an outdated version of Factorio. Thanks for the report though!

New response