There seems to be a bug affecting uiss and ugpf in 0.4.33. Trying to use either command with parameter 2 being a signal copied from a wire causes the destination register to be set to a null signal.
mov r1 [item=iron-plate]
ugpf r2 r1 'stack_size' ; works
mov r1 red1 ; red1 is some number of iron plate
ugpf r2 r1 'stack_size' ; sets r2 to null
Tested by modifying opcodes.lua to dump the signal value:
uiss = function(_) -- Utility Item Stack Size
Assert.two(_)
local signal = io.gettype(_[2], {'type', 'register'})
if signal.type ~= 'item' then
io.setsignal(_[1], NULL_SIGNAL)
local str = signalToStr(signal)
Assert.exception('Expecting [item=...] signal type, got \''.. str .. ' ' .. dump_value(signal) ..'\'.')
else
local proto = prototypes.item[signal.name]
Assert.check(proto ~= nil, 'Unknown item name specified.')
io.setsignal(_[1], { signal=signal, count=proto.stack_size })
end
end,
The output of this indicated that the signal object only has a name field, no type. This causes the if condition to be true, and the destination register to be set to a null signal.
Removing the if signal.type ~= 'item' then statement from both uiss and ugpf seems to fix the issue and hasn't (so far) caused any new problems for me.
