Spidertron Tiers (community updates)

by psznm

Adds 13 new unique Spidertrons! Whether high firepower, early game, speed, inventory size or fog war reveal, there is something for everyone.

a month ago
1.1 - 2.0
6.03K

g 2.0 / Space Age

a month ago

Any plans to modernize this?

a month ago

Hello, I have made the mod work for 2.0 / space age. Though I have not playtested it. Let me know if any bugs/weirdnesses pop up.

a month ago

In 2.0 environment, the recipe for the portable fusion reactor does not exist, so it does not work properly.

Because the research tree is not separated between SpaceAge and 2.0, it cannot be denied that the research tree in the SpaceAge environment and the flow and content of free play do not seem to mesh.
I think it would be more immersive if higher-level Spidertrons than regular Spidertrons were required for research.
I apologize for the extra work, but in my personal opinion it would be appropriate to make the recipe support for 2.0 and SpaceAge separate.

Google翻訳だからゲーム用単語が出てこないです・・・

a month ago

Thank you for the report. I have changed the recipe to fission reactor. I will not be balancing/tweaking the mod for both space age and vanilla though, or actually balancing/tweaking it at all, because I do not play Factorio much these days. Maybe somewhere in the future if I go for playing modded Factorio again. Anyone is welcome to make contributions though. Also I will try to fix reported bugs.

28 days ago

Is Spidertron Mk0 supposed to come after Spidertron Mk-1?

28 days ago
(updated 28 days ago)

Is Spidertron Mk0 supposed to come after Spidertron Mk-1?

As far as I know, yes. Everything indicates so. Note the different notation MkX vs Mk-X. The "Mk1" I think is the vanilla spidertron. While Mk-1 is supposed to be early prototype. It seems to me that the sequential number of the Mk-1 is not "1" but "-1". This is just me guessing tho. You would have to ask the original mod author.

19 days ago

Thank you for updating the mod. In the new tiers, the ability to control the Spidertrons remotely is missing. Could this be implemented?

New response