Nah, Fahrenheit technically is more accurate to measure than Celsius since it's got a smaller range between degrees. aka you get more degrees between boil and freeze of water with Fahrenheit than you do with Celsius, a whole 80 degrees more for the price of the origin of the measurement being kinda obscure :P
You are trolling, right? Or did you not pay attention in math?
You can have limitless fractions in both systems of measurement.
Partial troll partial not. Troll yes in that it messes with people who prefer Celsius over Fahrenheit. Not troll in that it's not inaccurate to say it can have more accuracy in measuring temperature with Fahrenheit than Celsius due to the fact each degree is a smaller difference in Fahrenheit than it is in Celsius. It's like comparing inches to centimeters, you have more centimeters per inch just as you have more Fahrenheit per Celsius. So, less about how fractional you can get with each system is and more the fact you have smaller steps per temperature degree in one vs the other. Also yes, I've paid attention in math, it's why I look at measurement systems and can differentiate which is more accurate to read from. If you need a more overt example, ignoring any predisposed preferences for distance measurement, it's like meters vs feet. If you only measure in feet or in meters without breaking it down further, you're less accurate with a whole meter than you are with a foot due to the meter being larger than a foot. This is ignoring inches, centimeters, etc and measuring purely by foot and meter
