Kitch's Less Intrusive Icons 2.0

by LCD

Less intrusive icons but working in 2.0 and 1.1, Original Author is Kitch

Content
1 year, 7 months ago
2.0
126

g Removed the module adjustments?

1 year, 4 months ago
(updated 1 year, 4 months ago)

I see you commented out the second half of the mod.

Was that needed for 2.0, or did you just not like that?
I note that the icon for it is still in the thumbnail (well, it is the original thumbnail)

Thanks for updating it - I miss Kitch.

10 months ago

Module adjustments? that commented out section is for the ghosting notifications when you place a blueprint.

4 months ago

It was a blue triangle icon indicating that modules are missing. Look at the mod thumbnail at the blue triangles.

https://lua-api.factorio.com/latest/prototypes/ItemRequestProxyPrototype.html
ItemRequestProxyPrototype 'item-request-proxy'
Entity used to signify that an entity is requesting items, for example modules for an assembling machine after it was blueprinted with modules inside.

2.0 did change how missing modules are displayed, so not sure how the original code would look without testing it..

14 days ago

Yeah when its uncommented it will spam the ghosting notification for blueprints over all blueprints. if you want it back on uncomment it? This is a fork after all not intended to be a full copy paste. I only forked this to make it work with 2.0 because Kitch was taking his sweet time updating his mod.

13 days ago

This mod was made as a QoL for his youtubing which went on hiatus some years ago for personal reasons.
It was designed so that all the little triangle warnings would me less intrusive while he was building - usually unpowered.
So that chunk of code is the 1.1 way of making the blue triangle notification that modules are needed but not present less annoying.
Since 2.x changes how that is displayed, it makes sense that it errors out. Not sure if it is really needed, as the module warnings are actually less annoying in 2.x and are informative.

My OP was basically wondering if you were planning on implementing it or not.

New response